-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
London | 26-ITP-Jan | Miriam Jorna | Sprint 1 | Wireframe #1153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-onboarding-module ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A well-prepared PR makes it easier for reviewers to approve it with minimal back-and-forth.
Can you take a look at this General Feedback to see if there
is anything you can do to make your PR more robust and ready?
Doing so can help speed up the review process.
Note:
- The cohort name should be
26-ITP-Jan. - You can use
placeholder.svgas the image in all three articles.
…ion beats perfection
miriamjorna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed footer, straightened out table; stuck to principle that production beats perfection
Wireframe/index.html
Outdated
| <article> | ||
| <img src="placeholder.svg" alt="" /> | ||
| <h2>Title</h2> | ||
| <img src="wireframe.png" alt="a wireframe sketch of this page"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| <img src="wireframe.png" alt="a wireframe sketch of this page"/> | |
| <img src="placeholder.svg" alt="placeholder image"/> |
cjyuan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issues to be addressed
- Code has syntax errors
- Code is not yet fully indented
- The layout of the page content do not quite match the wireframe
- TITLE and SHORT DESCRIPTION beneath it are not centered
- Articles 2 and 3 do not have the same dimension, and their image height do not align
- Footer content is not centered
- Footer is not fixed at the bottom of the viewport
Please read the General Feedback carefully.
Please note that in CYF courses, the recommended way to inform the reviewer of your changes is to do both of the following:
- Reply to their feedback.
- In the responses, clarify how each piece of feedback was addressed to demonstrate that you've carefully reviewed the suggestions.
- You may find the suggestions in this PR Guide useful.
- Your response may trigger a notification (depending on the reviewer's settings), helping ensure they’re aware of the updates you’ve made.
- In the responses, clarify how each piece of feedback was addressed to demonstrate that you've carefully reviewed the suggestions.
- Replace the "Reviewed" label by a "Needs review" label
- Without this label, the reviewer would not know if your changes is ready to be reviewed.
|
Many thanks, apologies for this to be automagically marked as Ready To Review when I only tried to get it out of Draft. Will mark as Needs Review when done with the update. |
Removing orphan </style> tag made the footer behave like it should. Followed the wireframe closely (whereas initial PR e.g. did not have parts of text centered). Re-did indenture to make code more legible. Also did the recommended reading. Thank you.
cjyuan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- According to https://validator.w3.org/, there are errors and warnings in your code. Please fix all of them?
After you have made all the changes, share your code to an AI tool and ask it to review your code in terms of semantic, accessibility, typo, and consistency.
It can often help us catch errors, improve consistency, and reinforce best practices.
Wireframe/index.html
Outdated
| </p> | ||
| <a href="">Read more</a> | ||
| </article> | ||
| <table width="80%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" bgcolor="#88ffcc" align="center"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not a good practice to use table for layout. Can you use CSS Grid Layout instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clearly showing my age here... Learnt HTML before CSS was born... Should now be fixed.
- Removed table attributes in HTML and moved to CSS if necessary (esp. width) - Removed VSCode's hobby to put /> in HTML where > is needed instead - Removed <section> tag. W3 HTML validation now clean. Then for the CSS: - undid the nesting - have left in "oklch()" since it is valid modern CSS even though the validator doesn't like it (dixit ChatGPT)
|
Thank you very much so far. I have learnt a LOT. Especially about how the instructions need to be followed precisely and not creatively. |
|
Code looks good, except the use of I will mark this as "Complete" first. Can you remove the table/tr/td elements and layout the three articles with CSS? |
|
Checked in ChatGTP that this is now as requested. |
|
Excellent! Now you can take your time to understand how Grid Layout work next. |

London | Jan26ITP | Miriam Jorna | Sprint 1 | Wireframe
Self checklist
Changelist
Task 1: Wireframe table. Now with a cleaned up branch structure.